Social change theorists suggest social change occurs for all the following reasons EXCEPT:

Social change theorists argue that social change typically arises from collective efforts and movements rather than from the actions of a single individual, even if that individual is powerful. While charismatic leaders can inspire and mobilize groups, change is generally more sustainable and widespread when it emerges from grassroots movements or collective actions. This reflects a key principle in social work and sociology that emphasizes the importance of community involvement and participation in driving social change.

Grassroots movements, which involve ordinary people advocating for change, have proven to be effective in addressing social issues and pushing for reforms. Collective action, similarly, highlights the necessity of individuals coming together to pursue common goals. Institutional reforms can also be a response to societal demands for change, reflecting a broader consensus rather than the vision of a single leader.

In contrast, while a powerful individual can certainly impact social movements, relying solely on one person for significant transformation goes against the grain of social change theories that emphasize collective dynamics. This understanding reinforces the notion that social change is more fruitful when viewed as a community-driven process rather than the result of individual leadership.